Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.9 backports 2021-04-30 #15957

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2021
Merged

v1.9 backports 2021-04-30 #15957

merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2021

Conversation

pchaigno
Copy link
Member

@pchaigno pchaigno commented Apr 30, 2021

Skipped in this PR:

Once this PR is merged, you can update the PR labels via:

$ for pr in 15765; do contrib/backporting/set-labels.py $pr done 1.9; done

@pchaigno pchaigno added kind/backports This PR provides functionality previously merged into master. backport/1.9 labels Apr 30, 2021
@pchaigno pchaigno force-pushed the pr/v1.9-backport-2021-04-30 branch 3 times, most recently from ca82e99 to 5040677 Compare May 4, 2021 16:58
This commit also extends the Jenkinsfile to define KUBEPROXY in the same
way as on 4.19.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
[ upstream commit bfe16c2 ]

This helper function will also encompass the 5.4 kernel in a subsequent
commit, so we should reflect that in its name.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
[ upstream commit a5b0ca7 ]

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
[ upstream commit 869a008 ]

The bandwidth manager is the only feature we can enable on 5.4 but not
on 4.19. It requires Linux v5.1.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
[ upstream commit dfb8220 ]

Since the goal of the 5.4 CI job is only to catch complexity issues,
other test suites are skipped. They are not expected to help us catch
new complexity issues compared to K8sVerifier and K8sDatapathConfig.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
@pchaigno pchaigno force-pushed the pr/v1.9-backport-2021-04-30 branch from 5040677 to b3da85f Compare May 4, 2021 18:44
@pchaigno
Copy link
Member Author

pchaigno commented May 4, 2021

test-1.17-5.4

@pchaigno pchaigno marked this pull request as ready for review May 4, 2021 20:25
@pchaigno pchaigno requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2021 20:25
@pchaigno
Copy link
Member Author

pchaigno commented May 4, 2021

test-backport-1.9

Copy link
Contributor

@ti-mo ti-mo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, does it need more review?

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. label May 5, 2021
@jrajahalme jrajahalme merged commit 430bd49 into v1.9 May 6, 2021
@jrajahalme jrajahalme deleted the pr/v1.9-backport-2021-04-30 branch May 6, 2021 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/backports This PR provides functionality previously merged into master. ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants