New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
datapath: Add a new option to skip socket lb when in pod ns #17154
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
Aug 12, 2021
test-net-next |
brb
force-pushed
the
pr/brb/fix-istio-disable-socket-lb
branch
from
August 13, 2021 10:13
8233676
to
f7d126b
Compare
test-me-please |
test-runtime |
brb
force-pushed
the
pr/brb/fix-istio-disable-socket-lb
branch
from
August 24, 2021 08:19
f7d126b
to
490607a
Compare
brb
changed the title
WIP: fix istio socket-lb
datapath: Adds a new option to skip socket lb when in pod ns
Aug 24, 2021
brb
added
release-note/minor
This PR changes functionality that users may find relevant to operating Cilium.
sig/loadbalancing
labels
Aug 24, 2021
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
removed
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
Aug 24, 2021
brb
force-pushed
the
pr/brb/fix-istio-disable-socket-lb
branch
from
August 24, 2021 08:35
490607a
to
6d54696
Compare
brb
changed the title
datapath: Adds a new option to skip socket lb when in pod ns
datapath: Add a new option to skip socket lb when in pod ns
Aug 24, 2021
test-me-please Job 'Cilium-PR-K8s-1.16-net-next' has 3 failures but they might be new flakes since it also hit 1 known flakes: #17060 (88.47) |
net-next hit #12511. Marking as ready to merge. |
brb
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Sep 30, 2021
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from master
to Backport pending to v1.10
in 1.10.5
Oct 4, 2021
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.10
to Backport done to v1.10
in 1.10.5
Oct 13, 2021
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.10
to Backport done to v1.10
in 1.10.5
Oct 13, 2021
1 task
2 tasks
jrajahalme
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2022
Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: #17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com>
jrajahalme
added a commit
to jrajahalme/cilium
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2022
Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: cilium#17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com>
joestringer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: #17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com>
qmonnet
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
[ upstream commit 6e2ce4a ] Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: #17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
qmonnet
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2022
[ upstream commit 6e2ce4a ] Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: #17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
pchaigno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2022
[ upstream commit 6e2ce4a ] Use the same condition in defining the label 'skip_policy_enforcement' as for jumping to it. Otherwise we could jump to a nonexisting label given a suitable datapath configuration. This does not seem possible now, as ENABLE_HOST_SERVICES_FULL should not be defined if ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY is defined. However, as the conditions for defining ENABLE_PER_PACKET_LB evolve, this would become a compilation bug. Fixes: #17154 Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/minor
This PR changes functionality that users may find relevant to operating Cilium.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Diff from previous PR (cannot push to the fork's branch, so opening a new PR instead):
ENABLE_SOCKET_LB_HOST_ONLY
.loadBalancer.hostNamespaceOnly
tohostServices.hostNamespaceOnly
.Supersedes #13882.