authx - Add configuration screen

[kainuk]

Overview

This extends the functionality of #19727 and adds a configuration screen. This will help with configuring for use with https://github.com/CiviMRF.

After

[civibot]

(Standard links)

• If this is your first pull-request for CiviCRM, please browse CONTRIBUTING.md for information about the development and testing processes.
• If you are reviewing this pull-request, you may wish to consult the test sites and the Review Standards (long template, short template).

[jaapjansma]

test this please

[totten]

jenkins, test this please

[totten]

@kainuk Oooh, I really like that you added a configuration screen!

I notice this branch didn't bring over the description or the test-coverage from #19727. It makes sense -- the tests were still failing due to the X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest issue. I think maybe we should use #19727 to add the LegacyAuthenticator and its test-coverage -- then use #22058 to add the configuration screen. To that end....

(1) I've ported your fix for protected function login(AuthenticatorTarget $tgt) to #19727 and added a fix for XMLHttpRequest.

(2) I tried out the new config screen, and it was working. 👍 Kind of impressed that it worked with so little code. I haven't lookd at CRM_Admin_Form_Generic much. How hard would it be to either (a) display some of the help/description text for the settings and/or (b) arrange some of the settings in a table so that it's easier to skim.

[BettyDolfing]

test this please

[BettyDolfing]

test this please

[totten]

Rebased to resolve recent conflicts.

To address my own review-feedback, I added a few commits to tweak the settings. It still uses the generic settings_pages, and I don't know how to make the generic page present a matrix of options... but the ordering+sizing now have more consistent alignment, and there's some help-text.

Updated description to add a screenshot of the final page.

Merge on pass.

[totten]

jenkins, test this please

Process note: Something quirky happened with Github. Contemporaneous with the previous comment, I force-pushed a very small copyedit (adding like 2-5 words; end commit eafc90f), but it didn't appear in web UI for 15+ min, and it didn't send a webhook.

[totten]

Process note: Hrm, Github also hasn't sent the webhook for test this please.

Well, there's a test-run for a nearly identical commit https://test.civicrm.org/job/CiviCRM-Core-PR/46962/ which we can use instead...

[colemanw]

It took a while but the test run eventually started