Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Afform - Fix getting and setting boolean/numeric types #27294

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2023

Conversation

colemanw
Copy link
Member

@colemanw colemanw commented Sep 4, 2023

Overview

Fixes: https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4465
Reviewer's cut of #27006

Technical Details

This ensures boolean and numeric fields always have the correct type set:
image

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Sep 4, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

colemanw commented Sep 7, 2023

Triggering the online demo to be rebuilt: Jenkins retest this please.
FYI @xavi-xaloc

@kurund
Copy link
Contributor

kurund commented Sep 11, 2023

@colemanw

Did a quick check and the Checkbox defaults are not working for me.
Screenshot from 2023-09-11 17-15-23

@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

@kurund I reproduced... sort of. If the default is actually set, then it works. But there was a bug in the Afform_Admin GUI causing it to not be set. Fixed with 41aa7ec

Whew, this PR has been a slog. Maybe we can finally merge it!

@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

@xavi-xaloc @kurund any objection to merging this now?

@xavi-xaloc
Copy link

Sorry, @colemanw , but I can't get it work, neither locally nor in the PR link. Could you, @kurund ?

Copy link
Contributor

@kurund kurund left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@colemanw @xavi-xaloc

Latest fixes are working as expected hence, merging the PR.

Screenshot from 2023-09-14 17-19-03

@kurund kurund merged commit 9a28694 into civicrm:master Sep 14, 2023
3 checks passed
@colemanw colemanw deleted the afformDataType branch September 14, 2023 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants