Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add param check before use getFieldOptions #28777

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wikimediaWfan
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

See some type error as "TypeError: Argument 1 passed to CRM_Core_BAO_CustomField::getFieldOptions() must be of the type int, null given"

Before

use getFieldOptions without check the passing params, like if id is null, then we could not locate the cacheKey

After

Only fetch the field options if id, datatype, and entity not null, to avoid the typeError

Copy link

civibot bot commented Dec 22, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Dec 22, 2023
@yashodha
Copy link
Contributor

@wikimediaWfan Can you please share steps to replicate this?

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

colemanw commented Jan 4, 2024

Reading the code, it looks like you'd only hit an error like this if the field does not exist.
@wikimediaWfan did you get a backtrace on what code called this function with a nonexistent field id?

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this as it turned out it was flagging a bug in extended reports (fixed in master)

@wikimediaWfan wikimediaWfan deleted the upstream branch January 5, 2024 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants