Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid extra calls to Smarty::getTemplateDir #30280

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ejegg
Copy link
Contributor

@ejegg ejegg commented May 29, 2024

They end up doing lots of redundant path normalization. Make sure we only register each directory once per process, even if we are resetting the Config singleton multiple times (e.g. for locale swapping).

Overview

Stop slowdowns caused by lots of redundant calls to internal smarty functions.

Before

We noticed long-running processes with template rendering would slow down over time, to the point where rendering a single email would take 10 sec. This happened when using Smarty 3 or 5, but not with Smarty 2.

After

Long-running processes with rendering do not slow down.

Technical Details

Profiling showed most of the time in the Smarty::_realpath function, called from Smarty::_normalizeTemplateConfig. It turns out just calling getTemplateDir triggers this over and over again. We are switching locales during the long-running process to render different language emails, so the config hooks are running and re-registering template directories.

They end up doing lots of redundant path normalization. Make sure
we only register each directory once per process, even if we are
resetting the Config singleton multiple times (e.g. for locale
swapping).
Copy link

civibot bot commented May 29, 2024

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label May 29, 2024
@ejegg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ejegg commented May 29, 2024

Oops, looks like @eileenmcnaughton already submitted a similar PR

@ejegg ejegg closed this May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
1 participant