Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider "⿱ 一 八" as one unit? #9

Open
hfhchan opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Consider "⿱ 一 八" as one unit? #9

hfhchan opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@hfhchan
Copy link

hfhchan commented Oct 28, 2016

The component would be &hkcs-comp-0001;
Glyph of component would be http://en.glyphwiki.org/glyph/hkcs_comp-0001.svg

@kawabata
Copy link
Contributor

When it is formally encoded to the UCS, yes, I will indeed
use it. Until then, to avoid infinite complication of multiple sets
of component sets, I decided to use only the CDP components.

I know that it wouldn't be enough, but please understand the ease
of processing when only one non-UCS character sets are to be used ;->

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:19 PM, hfhchan notifications@github.com wrote:

The component would be &hkcs-comp-0001;
Glyph of component would be http://en.glyphwiki.org/glyph/
hkcs_comp-0001.svg

https://camo.githubusercontent.com/21f50893c66fceeae5a647215805737afe657a32/687474703a2f2f656e2e676c79706877696b692e6f72672f676c7970682f686b63735f636f6d702d303030312e706e67


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#9, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANPvEI1AIk_p3OrAZIax1MqfGbX46c2ks5q4aHugaJpZM4KjJdg
.


川幡 太一 (KAWABATA, Taichi) E-mail: kawabata.taichi@gmail.com

@hfhchan
Copy link
Author

hfhchan commented Dec 9, 2016

What do you think of extending the CDP set?

@kawabata
Copy link
Contributor

kawabata commented Dec 9, 2016 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants