[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit-autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/asottile/pyupgrade: v3.9.0 → v3.10.1
• github.com/psf/black: 23.7.0 → 23.9.1
• github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2: v0.8.1 → v0.9.2
• github.com/pycqa/flake8.git: 6.0.0 → 6.1.0
• github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-mypy: v1.4.1 → v1.5.1
• github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.280 → v0.0.288
• github.com/pycqa/pylint: v3.0.0a6 → v3.0.0a7

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (fc68482) 92.95% compared to head (a16e293) 92.95%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #338   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.95%   92.95%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3778     3778           
=======================================
  Hits         3512     3512           
  Misses        266      266           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ns-rse]

Good 🤖

[jonbarker68]

Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks.

[groadabike]

Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks.

I checked the error for my PR and is because this message

notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use > is / is not, for instance checks use isinstance()

Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring to isinstance(cfg, Docstring) fixing the error

[jonbarker68]

Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge.

…

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 19:46, Gerardo Roa Dabike ***@***.***> wrote: Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks. I checked the error for my PR and is because this message notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use > is / is not, for instance checks use isinstance() Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring to isinstance(cfg, Docstring) fixing the error — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#338 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[groadabike]

Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge.
…

I did the fix and pushed it.
Now the pre-commit check passed

[jonbarker68]

Thanks for that. On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 20:03, Gerardo Roa Dabike ***@***.***> wrote:

…

Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge. … <#m_250533183976321632_> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 19:46, Gerardo Roa Dabike *@*.*> wrote: Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks. I checked the error for my PR and is because this message notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use > is / is not, for instance checks use isinstance() Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring to isinstance(cfg, Docstring) fixing the error — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#338 (comment) <#338 (comment)>>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.*> I did the fix and pushed it. Now the pre-commit check passed — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#338 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJFGMAXMN63JU6ACF5TX2NIHPANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Professor Jon Barker, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield +44 (0) 114 222 1824

[groadabike]

keeping the numpy version lower than 1.25.0 "fixed" the issue.
but, we still need to find what is the main problem