-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V5.8.0rc #200
V5.8.0rc #200
Conversation
@mandli and @ketch: This seems to be failing in pyclaw with many more errors than what you saw in clawpack/pyclaw#658. Can you take a look and see if there's a real problem or if I can ignore this? |
It looks like there are slight differences in some of the test results. I have not see this before so it bears looking into. |
I just tried running the tests on my laptop, cloning a new copy via:
It gives the same errors as on travis, e.g.
|
I tried the same (fresh clone and running the same tests, actually by just copy/pasting the commands posted by @rjleveque . The tests pass for me. Could this be due to a compiler change? |
Oops, I forgot to actually install the freshly-cloned version, so I was running an old version. Now I get the same errors. I'll see if I can track down the change that caused this. |
Never mind my last message (now deleted). This was a very serious bug that I introduced. It should be fixed by clawpack/pyclaw#660. |
Ah, good to know the regression tests are still useful in finding bugs and not just a nuisance! |
Fixed bug in philim but travis not passing due to mpi/hdf5 issue.
I think the remaining open PRs can wait for now and we should release v5.8.0 with several important bug fixes.