The name "upstart" collides with an ubuntu package

[tfoote]

It should be renamed.

[mikepurvis]

Happy to change it—would robot_upstart be acceptable?

For my understanding, though, what are the contexts in which the conflict is an issue? From the end-user's perspective, "upstart" and "ros-hydro-upstart" are different packages.

[tfoote]

There will be issues when you start trying to install things that depend on
"upstart" as it won't know if you're looking for the rosdep or the
package. And we often refer to packages w/o the full name which makes "did
you install the upstart package?" ambiguious.

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:00 PM, mikepurvis notifications@github.comwrote:

Happy to change it—would robot_upstart be acceptable?

For my understanding, though, what are the contexts in which the conflict
is an issue? From the end-user's perspective, "upstart" and
"ros-hydro-upstart" are different packages.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1#issuecomment-23294314
.

[tfoote]

robot_upstart is much better.

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Tully Foote tfoote@osrfoundation.orgwrote:

There will be issues when you start trying to install things that depend
on "upstart" as it won't know if you're looking for the rosdep or the
package. And we often refer to packages w/o the full name which makes "did
you install the upstart package?" ambiguious.

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:00 PM, mikepurvis notifications@github.comwrote:

Happy to change it—would robot_upstart be acceptable?

For my understanding, though, what are the contexts in which the conflict
is an issue? From the end-user's perspective, "upstart" and
"ros-hydro-upstart" are different packages.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1#issuecomment-23294314
.

[mikepurvis]

Changed to robot_upstart.