-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v 1.0 alpha 3 (Sourcery refactored) #205
Conversation
fastkml/kml.py
Outdated
text = self._snippet.get("text") | ||
if text: | ||
if text := self._snippet.get("text"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function _Feature.snippet
refactored with the following changes:
- Use named expression to simplify assignment and conditional (
use-named-expression
)
if self._timespan is None: | ||
return None | ||
return self._timespan.begin[0] | ||
return None if self._timespan is None else self._timespan.begin[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function _AbstractView.begin
refactored with the following changes:
- Lift code into else after jump in control flow (
reintroduce-else
) - Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp
)
if altitude_mode is not None: | ||
self.altitude_mode = altitude_mode.text | ||
else: | ||
if altitude_mode is None: | ||
altitude_mode = element.find(f"{gx.NS}altitudeMode") | ||
self.altitude_mode = altitude_mode.text | ||
self.altitude_mode = altitude_mode.text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function _AbstractView.from_element
refactored with the following changes:
- Swap if/else to remove empty if body (
remove-pass-body
) - Hoist repeated code outside conditional statement (
hoist-statement-from-if
)
|
Sourcery Code Quality Report✅ Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.27%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review
Legend |
Codecov ReportBase: 92.42% // Head: 92.44% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #205 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 92.42% 92.44% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 4357 4354 -3
===========================================
- Hits 4027 4025 -2
+ Misses 330 329 -1
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
dd1138a
to
4b3b49f
Compare
4b3b49f
to
bee8bac
Compare
Pull Request #203 refactored by Sourcery.
If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.
NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Review changes via command line
To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the
develop
branch, then run:Help us improve this pull request!