Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use nanoTime instead of currentTimeMillis for elapsed time #21

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danielcompton
Copy link
Member

System/currentTimeMillis is not guaranteed to progress monotonically. NTP shifts, leap seconds, and manual system time changes can all cause elapsed time calculations to be incorrect if you use
currentTimeMillis.

nanoTime is always calculated against a fixed point and proceeds monotonically.

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/12914-monotonic.md
has a good discussion on monotonic time.

System/currentTimeMillis is not guaranteed to progress monotonically.
NTP shifts, leap seconds, and manual system time changes can all cause
elapsed time calculations to be incorrect if you use
currentTimeMillis.

nanoTime is always calculated against a fixed point and proceeds
monotonically.

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/12914-monotonic.md
has a good discussion on monotonic time.
vedang pushed a commit to vedang/durable-queue that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
System/currentTimeMillis is not guaranteed to progress monotonically.
NTP shifts, leap seconds, and manual system time changes can all cause
elapsed time calculations to be incorrect if you use
currentTimeMillis.

nanoTime is always calculated against a fixed point and proceeds
monotonically.

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/12914-monotonic.md
has a good discussion on monotonic time.

Closes: clj-commons#21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant