Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Populate Ref.language_note #70

Closed
xrotwang opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Populate Ref.language_note #70

xrotwang opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@xrotwang
Copy link
Member

Previously, Ref.language_note was filled with the content of the lgcode field of a BibTeX record. This isn't done so far for the new DB initialization. If we reinstitute it, though, we may want to cleanup/polish the format of these field - @d97hah possibly even allow markdown?

@xrotwang xrotwang modified the milestone: Glottolog 3.1 Mar 30, 2017
@d97hah
Copy link
Contributor

d97hah commented Mar 30, 2017 via email

@xrotwang
Copy link
Member Author

@d97hah Does that mean you'd actually use this feature - i.e. make the comments more extensive? Other than the conversion before rendering on the web, there would also be another price for this more expressive syntax: the markdown link syntax [label](url) could possibly conflict with the syntax for language identifiers [abc]. So if we'd change to allowing markdown, I'd say we also switch the language identifiers to glottocodes to make them less ambiguous.

@d97hah
Copy link
Contributor

d97hah commented Mar 30, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants