Log a warning when doing iter_by_col_range
without an index
#971
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Changes
Adds a warning to
iter_by_col_range
when there is no applicable index and the table has >1000 rows. Should make it easier for us to debug BitCraft performance. This is an obviously suboptimal implementation which is intended as a stopgap until we can properly implement this warning.Concerns:
Possible alternatives:
filter_by_{col}
methods unless there's an index.query!
macro, but will catch the vast majority of cases.#[deprecated]
.slow_unindexed_filter_by_{col}
.Example
Using a modified version of the
spacetimedb-quickstart
module with afind_named
reducer which doesPerson::filter_by_name
. Note that I've snipped some calls; the table count is in fact accurate.TODO:
API and ABI breaking changes
N/a.
[phoebe@phoebe-framework:~/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB/modules/spacetimedb-quickstart]$ spacetime call demo list_over_age 20
Expected complexity level and risk
2 - social concern that we merge this and then never come back and write the better version.