async voting process #292
async voting process #292
Conversation
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
| @@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ If a vote is taken during a WG meeting, the follow rules will be followed: | |||
| [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bw5s9sC2ggYyAiGJHEk7xm-q2KG6jyrfBy69ifkdmt0/edit#gid=0). | |||
| Members must acknowledge their presence verbally, meaning, adding yourself | |||
| to the "Attendees" section of the Agenda document is not sufficient. | |||
| * When a vote is called, votes will be collected over the following week: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd prefer if we didn't mandate a week since its possible all voting members are on the call when the vote is started. So what about:
- When a vote is called if all voting members are present in the meeting, and they all agree to vote at that time, then votes will be tallied during that meeting.
- If not all voting members are present, or some wish more time, then those members will be allowed one week to vote asynchronously. In the case of a PR vote, they will post a comment to the PR with their vote. In other cases an email to the CloudEvents mailing list is expected.
- In the case of yes/no votes, each vote will be either "yes", "no" or "abstain". In the case of non-yes/no votes, the WG will agree on the valid responses prior to starting the vote.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking that async voting would replace the roll-call style voting on the call, making better use of people's time, and it can also serve to capture any statements people make about why they are voting one way or another, which would be great to know if the group decides to revisit a decision in the future.
|
Can you sign your commit? The DCO check is not happy |
this is based on what I've observed in TOC votes and seems to work well in practice (though I've only followed a few votes) Signed-off-by: Sarah Allen <sarahallen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Allen <sarahallen@google.com>
|
Clarification: wait +1 week is only if everyone hasn't voted |
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
| @@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ If a vote is taken during a WG meeting, the follow rules will be followed: | |||
| [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bw5s9sC2ggYyAiGJHEk7xm-q2KG6jyrfBy69ifkdmt0/edit#gid=0). | |||
| Members must acknowledge their presence verbally, meaning, adding yourself | |||
| to the "Attendees" section of the Agenda document is not sufficient. | |||
| * When a vote is called, unless all viting members have voted, the vote will be | |||
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
| * When a vote is called, unless all viting members have voted, the vote will be | ||
| tallied no less than one week after calling the vote. | ||
| * Voting process: | ||
| * Comment on the PR: "agree, yes, +1", "disagree, no, -1", or "abstain". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's make this a bit more concrete and less chance of someone using the word "agree" w/o realizing they're voting.
Comment on the PR: LGTM, NOT LGTM or ABSTAIN
Signed-off-by: Sarah Allen <sarahallen@google.com>
|
Approved during the 9/6 call |
this is based on what I've observed in TOC votes and seems to work well in practice (though I've only followed a few votes)