Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

call syncTime for hibernatable websocket autoresponses #1993

Conversation

Frederik-Baetens
Copy link
Contributor

I believe it should be ok to only do this for the autoresponse because I think the non-autoresponse path already calls synctime.

Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any way to test this?

@Frederik-Baetens
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any way to test this?

There likely is. I'll have a look. I'm not really up to speed on what the tests for this code look like, but I don't expect this to be too difficult to test.

@Frederik-Baetens Frederik-Baetens merged commit d81c327 into main Apr 9, 2024
10 checks passed
@nvie
Copy link

nvie commented Apr 16, 2024

Any way to test this?

I made a minimal replication for this bug. One way to test this would be to deploy this worker to an environment with this fixed applied and run the client script (see the video).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants