Have deployment view output in table

[jspspike]

Have new view for wrangler deployment view command
Example output

 ⛅️ wrangler 2.12.0
--------------------
🚧`wrangler deployments` is a beta command. Please report any issues to https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/new/choose


Deployment ID: 07d7143d-0284-427e-ba22-2d5e6e91b479
Created on:    2023-03-02T21:05:15.622446Z
Author:        jspspike@gmail.com
Source:        Upload from Wrangler 🤠
------------------------------------------------------------
Author ID:          e5a3ca86e08fb0940d3a05691310bb42
Usage Model:        bundled
Handlers:           fetch
Compatibility Date: 2022-10-03
--------------------------bindings--------------------------
[[r2_buckets]]
binding = "MY_BUCKET"
bucket_name = "testr2"

[[kv_namespaces]]
id = "79300c6d17eb4180a07270f450efe53f"
binding = "yeee"

---------------------------script---------------------------

(() => {
  // index.js
  addEventListener("fetch", (event) => {
    event.respondWith(handleRequest(event.request));
  });
  async function handleRequest(request) {
    return new Response(JSON.stringify("Hello r2"), {
      headers: { "content-type": "text/plain" }
    });
  }
})();
//# sourceMappingURL=index.js.map

Author has included the following, where applicable:

• Tests
• Changeset

Reviewer has performed the following, where applicable:

• Checked for inclusion of relevant tests
• Checked for inclusion of a relevant changeset
• Checked for creation of associated docs updates
• Manually pulled down the changes and spot-tested

Fixes # [insert issue number].

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: bff3c91

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
wrangler	Minor

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

A wrangler prerelease is available for testing. You can install this latest build in your project with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/4327065671/npm-package-wrangler-2844

You can reference the automatically updated head of this PR with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/prs/2844/npm-package-wrangler-2844

Or you can use npx with this latest build directly:

npx https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/4327065671/npm-package-wrangler-2844 dev path/to/script.js

Additional artifacts:

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/4327065671/npm-package-cloudflare-pages-shared-2844

Note that these links will no longer work once the GitHub Actions artifact expires.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (jacobmgevans/deployment-view-rollback@aff4c8f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                           Coverage Diff                            @@
##             jacobmgevans/deployment-view-rollback    #2844   +/-   ##
========================================================================
  Coverage                                         ?   74.13%           
========================================================================
  Files                                            ?      166           
  Lines                                            ?    10319           
  Branches                                         ?     2768           
========================================================================
  Hits                                             ?     7650           
  Misses                                           ?     2669           
  Partials                                         ?        0           

[JacobMGEvans]

The PR looks like a great refactor and polishing up of the output!! There are a couple things to fix and a few linter issues.

[Skye-31]

It might be a good idea to hide the contents of the script behind a flag or something similar - if someone has a large worker, such as a 5mb one, this would flood their terminal

Could also truncate the contents of the script if a flag isn't desired

[JacobMGEvans]

It might be a good idea to hide the contents of the script behind a flag or something similar - if someone has a large worker, such as a 5mb one, this would flood their terminal

Could also truncate the contents of the script if a flag isn't desired

@admah Interesting thought.