-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update git-cms-init #101
Update git-cms-init #101
Conversation
Better fix for the issue reported at cms-sw#99 (comment), which does not break git-cms-init for non cms-sw master repositorties and with the added advantage of using a standard git command instead of an ad-hoc sequence of "plumbing" git commands.
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for branch master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. external issue cms-sw/cmsdist#4308 |
@fwyzard , aren't we going to miss the updates already merged in |
As far as I can tell, Doing
should be equivalent to
but simpler. What do you mean by
|
@fwyzard , see the cms-bot message here cms-sw/cmssw#24429 (comment) ? |
As far as I can see it says
+1
Tested at: 4bec48b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24429/30181/summary.html
The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR
after doing git cms-merge-topic:
edb9f98
b31d805
af20b1d
19ae827
111cd66
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24429/30181/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24429/30181/git-merge-result
What should I be looking at ?
|
I mean the extra merge commits on top of IB. My only concern is that, after your changes, are we still going to get these extra commits (if any) while testing PRs? |
I guess you can give it a try before merging ? On the other hand, As for the release branch (e.g. CMSSW_10_3_X) I always assumed that |
Better fix for the issue reported at #99 (comment), which does not break
git-cms-init
for non cms-sw master repositories and with the added advantage of using a standard git command instead of an ad-hoc sequence of "plumbing" git commands.