Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modified PR for newOfflinePuID #10398

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Aug 5, 2015

Conversation

jbrands
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrands jbrands commented Jul 27, 2015

This is the subsequent PR of #10330 (comment)

This request is for including the new offline pu Id weights.
There's a new parameter set in RecoJets/JetProducers/python/puJetIDAlgo_cff.py
I included a new variable "etaBinnedWeights" because the new weights a trained for 4 different eta regions.

The new variables are included in RecoJets/JetProducers/src/PileupJetIdAlgo.cc

The code can be checked with RecoJets/JetProducers/test/testJetTools_cfg.py

I did the runTheMatrix.py offline check without error messages

Some discrimination plots can be find in:
http://www.hephy.at/user/jbrandstetter/

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jbrands for CMSSW_7_6_X.

modified PR for newOfflinePuID

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/JetReco
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoJets/JetProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @vadler, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @yslai, @schoef, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 27, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 4ce8a72
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
135.4 step3

runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step3_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log

4.53 step5

runTheMatrix-results/4.53_RunPhoton2012B+RunPhoton2012B+HLTD+RECODreHLT+HARVESTDreHLT+MINIAODDreHLT/step5_RunPhoton2012B+RunPhoton2012B+HLTD+RECODreHLT+HARVESTDreHLT+MINIAODDreHLT.log

1306.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/1306.0_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15/step5_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15.log

1330.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15/step5_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15.log

50202.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550.log

25202.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10398/6647/summary.html

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 27, 2015

PAT steps are broken:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos/slimming/pileupJetId_cfi.py", line 3, in <module>
    from RecoJets.JetProducers.PileupJetIDParams_cfi import full_74x_chs
ImportError: cannot import name full_74x_chs


@ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed now.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2015

Pull request #10398 was updated. @cvuosalo, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @slava77, @vadler, @danduggan can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 4, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

for #10398 2178190

  • code changes are OK now
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show differences only in miniAOD (we have miniAOD DQM in IBs now. Nice!)
    Here's just a random plot from 25202 (ttbar pu 35@25ns)
    wf25202_cleanslim_mvapuid_endcap

Memory check based on CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-04-2300 /test area test10398/
running PromptReco (--reco --miniaod --aod --dqmio --alcareco TkAlMuonIsolated+HcalCalIterativePhiSym+DtCalib+MuAlCalIsolatedMu+MuAlOverlaps+MuAlZMuMu) config on /store/data/Run2015B/DoubleMuon/RAW/v1/000/251/721/00000/44C77595-412A-E511-930E-02163E012A2C.root

MEM_LIVE on 10 events actually shows a 5 MB decrease:
https://slava77sk.web.cern.ch/slava77sk/reco/cgi-bin/igprof-navigator/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-04-2300-orig-251721.10evts

1,963,723,113   6,989,059   main
32,763,366  259,038 PileupJetIdProducer::produce(edm::Event&, edm::EventSetup const&)
29,160,490  230,596 PileupJetIdAlgo::computeMva()
34,113,684  264,357 PileupJetIdAlgo::bookReader()

https://slava77sk.web.cern.ch/slava77sk/reco/cgi-bin/igprof-navigator/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-04-2300-test10398-251721.10evts

1,959,849,143   6,962,039   main
29,852,808  240,362 PileupJetIdProducer::produce(edm::Event&, edm::EventSetup const&)
29,160,490  230,596 PileupJetIdAlgo::computeMva()
29,446,412  233,018 PileupJetIdAlgo::bookReader(float)

@ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 Is this a +1?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

+1

@ahinzmann thanks for noticing
I was pasting a summary incrementally and missed the most important piece

@monttj
Copy link
Contributor

monttj commented Aug 5, 2015

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

@deguio please check this one
there is an interference with another PR in the queue and I wanted this one to go first since it has running code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants