Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REBASED Pr81x l1t-tsg-v9 (part 2) for Sept 2016 MC production #15757

Merged

Conversation

rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic rekovic commented Sep 7, 2016

This is the rebased version of #15746.

rekovic and others added 30 commits September 7, 2016 10:59
eta hits & quality will be written in the same order as they are read
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 12, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15086/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: a301eac

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15757/15086/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
1003.0 step1

DAS Error

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Sep 12, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 12, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15090/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15757/15090/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • 136.731_RunSinglePh2016B+RunSinglePh2016B+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimSinglePh_HIPM+HARVESTDR2

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 12, 2016

+1

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Sep 12, 2016

@slava77 @davidlange6 How do we proceed with the problem with the test above due to missing matrix map?

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic - not to worry for now - but please start working on the changes needed for the back port...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet