Modified delay for LS timeout in online DQM

[threus]

Modified delay for LS timeout in online DQM to 4 mins.

Reasoning behind: http://cmsonline.cern.ch/cms-elog/1004988

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @threus for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/Integration

@kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @batinkov, @thomreis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20218/224

[davidlange6]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/22397/console Started: 2017/08/21 14:45

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: 0fdd89e

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
1f919e0
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20218/22397/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20218/22397/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20218/22397/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

• RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
1003.0 step1

DAS Error

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
1f919e0
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20218/22397/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20218/22397/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

[dmitrijus]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[davidlange6]

merge