Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ged photon modifications for pp_on_AA_2018 era #23520

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2018

Conversation

bi-ran
Copy link
Contributor

@bi-ran bi-ran commented Jun 7, 2018

this PR aims to improve ged photon reconstruction performance in heavy ion collisions with the following changes:

  • set upper bound for supercluster phi widths
  • set supercluster phi widths to 0.2

some slides on the performance can be found at [1] and [2].

@ttrk @mandrenguyen

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@@ -154,3 +154,8 @@

#define the default clustering type
particleFlowSuperClusterECAL = particleFlowSuperClusterECALMustache.clone()

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_pp_on_AA_2018_cff import pp_on_AA_2018
pp_on_AA_2018.toModify(particleFlowSuperClusterECAL, useDynamicDPhiWindow = False
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where are the closing braces?

Was this code checked?
http://cms-sw.github.io/PRWorkflow

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, this was fixed and tested locally but the changes were not committed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 7, 2018

@cmsbuild please test workflow 158.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28546/console Started: 2018/06/07 18:32

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @bi-ran for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @jainshilpi, @rovere, @argiro, @lgray, @varuns23 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23520/28546/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-23520/158.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2902639
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2902447
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 8, 2018

+1

for #23520 dca2d4f

  • changes are in line with the PR description (and the linked slides)
  • jenkins tests pass [wf 158.0 runs]
  • local test with 200 events with wf 158.0 shows roughly expected behavior (the number of good photons is small)
    • the impact of the CPU cost is negligible (particleFlowSuperClusterECAL is down from 7 to 5 ms /evt; the effects on other modules is even smaller)

Here are a few plots of EB and EE R9 and cluster size: more pure egamma-like (high R9) clusters are roughly preserved; the size of clusters is reduced. The effect is most visible in the EB.
wf158 0_eb_r9
wf158 0_eb_size

wf158 0_ee_r9

wf158 0_ee_size

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a1822d2 into cms-sw:master Jun 10, 2018
@bi-ran bi-ran deleted the ged_supercluster_phi_width branch April 4, 2019 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants