NanoAODv6 updates, part 1

[peruzzim]

PR description:

This pull request includes the bulk of NanoAOD updates for the upcoming V6 version.
Further minor tunings can be expected in a second pull request to follow.

• Calculate (only if needed) and store DeepTauV2p1 in all releases
• Add non-mass-decorrelated DeepDoubleX taggers
• Store normalization separately for different parameter space points in one dataset (Randomized Parameters feature)
• Fix definition of one quality bit in electron trigger object
• Fix cosTheta vertex formula
• Introduce run2_nanoAOD_106Xv1 modifier, meant to be used on 106X MiniAOD samples that do not have DeepTauV2p1 pre-calculated (e.g. UL2017)

Backports will follow to 10_2_X and 10_6_X.

PR validation:

This version was validated using the standard NanoAOD integration setup (running on MiniAOD created in 80X, 94X, 102X, 106X).

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28103/12103

• This PR adds an extra 76KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/jets_cff.py modified in PR(s): Adding a fine-tuned version of the 'betastar' kind of variables. #26767, AOD changes from JME #28077

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @peruzzim for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Eras
Configuration/StandardSequences
PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@kpedro88, @peruzzim, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fgolf, @santocch, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @gpetruc, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[peruzzim]

please test workflow 1325.6,1325.7,1325.8,1329.1,136.7722,136.7952,136.8521

testing all NANOAOD workflows explicitly

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9e97a8f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cfe0d6/2748/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cfe0d6/2748/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 118 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2956830
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 92
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2956397
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.56 KiB( 33 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1325.7 ): 0.560 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[peruzzim]

+xpog

all as expected, changes in NANOAOD

[santocch]

+1

[peruzzim]

Could you please review this? It would help speeding up backports to have it merged soon. Thanks!

[fabiocos]

@peruzzim is there a special reason not to have this file integrated inside the .cc plugin implementation?

[peruzzim]

I did it because I am including this header in PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/plugins/NanoAODOutputModule.cc.
If you have a suggestion on how this should be done differently, please let me know and I'll implement it in the next PR.

[fabiocos]

@peruzzim ok, you are correct, I agree

[fabiocos]

+operations

the update of Eras is coherent with the purpose and implementation of the PR

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1