Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend the ECAL-only workflows with more PF and DQM modules #29635

Merged
merged 7 commits into from May 13, 2020

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented May 5, 2020

Update the default configuration of PFECALSuperClusterProducer

Update the default parameters provided by fillDescriptions() to those
used in the particleFlowSuperClusterECALMustache module.

Split particleFlowSuperClusterECAL_cfi into a cff and multiple cfi files

Each cfi file defines a single module and its customisations:

  • particleFlowSuperClusterECALMustache
    (autogenerated by fillDescriptions)
  • particleFlowSuperClusterECALBox
  • particleFlowSuperClusterECALOnly
    (a clone of Mustache with various modifiers - see below)

The cff files includes the three cfi files.

particleFlowSuperClusteringSequence_cff is modified to use the cff file,
in order to make all modules available downstream.

Add an ECAL-only PF supercluster module

Add an ECAL-only configuration based on the default (Mustache) configuration,
using the "online" regression instead of "offline_v2", without the
requirement of tracks and vertices, and with updated
EB/EE/ES PF cluster thresholds.

Add ECAL-only PF modules to the ECAL-only reconstruction sequence

Rework ECAL-only DQM

Add an ECAL-only copy of ecalMonitorTask that uses the
ECAL-only PF superclusters from "particleFlowSuperClusterECALOnly" and
disables the "doExtra" plots to avoid the dependency on L1 trigger
objects.

Rework the ECAL-only DQM sequence to use this module, instead of
skipping the monitoring of the superclusters altogether.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented May 5, 2020

Follow up to #29620.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented May 5, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29635/15021

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5990/console Started: 2020/05/05 04:11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/StandardSequences
DQM/EcalMonitorTasks
DQMOffline/Ecal
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers

@perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @franzoni, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU, @slava77, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @argiro, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @slomeo, @rovere, @lgray, @Martin-Grunewald, @sobhatta, @fabiocos, @lecriste, @afiqaize, @VinInn, @varuns23, @dgulhan, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

+1
Tested at: b2372d7
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10bb51/5990/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-04-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10bb51/5990/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696239
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2695919
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@amassiro
Copy link
Contributor

amassiro commented May 5, 2020

@rchatter

fwyzard added a commit to cms-patatrack/cmssw that referenced this pull request May 11, 2020
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 6abcdc2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10bb51/6231/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10bb51/6231/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-10bb51/10824.511_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFullPatatrack_ECALOnlyCPU_2018+HARVESTFullPatatrack_ECALOnlyCPU_2018

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2697527
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 41
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2697167
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 12, 2020

+1

for #29635 6abcdc2

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no relevant differences; the ecalOnly wf 10824.511 runs

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 12, 2020

+1

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+operations

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 060bed0 into cms-sw:master May 13, 2020
@fwyzard fwyzard deleted the Add_ECAL-only_workflows branch May 14, 2020 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants