New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-gex11 Add a scenario D66 and workflow 30634 with 16 strip GE21 #31451
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@slomeo @watson-ij Just made a workflow still using ME0 for 16 strip GE21. Once this is accepted will make the one when GE0 replaces ME0 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31451/18333
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @cvuosalo, @wajidalikhan, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @franzoni, @silviodonato, @kpedro88, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Configuration/Geometry/README.md
Outdated
@@ -88,5 +88,6 @@ Several detector combinations have been generated: | |||
* D63 = T21+C11+M4+I11+O5+F4 | |||
* D64 = T22+C11+M4+I11+O5+F4 | |||
* D65 = T23+C11+M4+I11+O5+F4 | |||
* D66 = T17+C11+M8+I11+O5+F4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed T17 to T21
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mmusich while I agree for new scenarios it's better to use a more modern tracker, what is the intention for the 6 scenarios currently using T17 when it is "decommissioned"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose they should all be migrated to T21. @emiglior is preparing a PR about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless of course some other subsystem explicitly wants to keep T17 around.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's move to #30512
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
+upgrade |
Looks good. GEM warnings are gone. HGCal remain. From step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D66+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal.log
|
Yes, I noticed the HGCal warnings earlier today and opened #31506. Those are unrelated to this PR. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
@silviodonato Could you merge this PR? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
Add a scenario D66 and workflow 30634 with 16 strip GE21
PR validation:
Test using runTheMatrix using the workflow 30634.0
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special