Remove temporarily ctppsProtons from recoCTPPSTask (Run-3 only)

[silviodonato]

PR description:

We need a new global tag to solve #32340. This PR temporarily removes ctppsProtons from recoCTPPSTask to move on the validation of CMSSW_11_2_0_pre10, if the preparation of the new global tag will take too much time.

PR validation:

cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions auto:phase1_2021_realistic -s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,RECOSIM,EI,PAT,VALIDATION:@standardValidation+@miniAODValidation,DQM:@standardDQM+@ExtraHLT+@miniAODDQM --datatier GEN-SIM-RECO,MINIAODSIM,DQMIO -n 10 --geometry DB:Extended --era Run3 --eventcontent RECOSIM,MINIAODSIM,DQM --filein file:/afs/cern.ch/user/s/sdonato/ORPlxplus/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre10/src/debug_PPS/badd237c-4857-4f48-b10f-52c832f57f02_ev1126.root (see #32340.)

Backport

to be backported in 11_2_X (#32346)

[silviodonato]

please test

[silviodonato]

@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 : @jan-kaspar agreed to temporarily disable PPS reco in Run-3 #32207 (comment)

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32352/20194

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

• CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-30-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/11211/console Started: 2020/12/01 13:56

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @silviodonato (Silvio Donato) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoPPS/Configuration

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jan-kaspar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[silviodonato]

urgent
to unblock the Run-3 RelVals of CMSSW_11_2_0_pre10 (see #32340)

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 40ed42d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fb79a0/11211/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-30-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fb79a0/11211/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 18 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529563
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
• Checked 148 log files, 34 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

[slava77]

Reco comparison results: 18 differences found in the comparisons

the baseline has in 4.53 step3 log

%MSG-e ExcessiveTime:  PFElecTkProducer:uncleanedOnlyPfTrackElec@streamBeginRun  30-Nov-2020 13:17:02 CET Run: 194533 Stream: 0
ExcessiveTime: Module used 1090.46 seconds of time which exceeds the error threshold configured in the Timing Service of 600 seconds.

@smuzaffar
did we have some infrastructure issue in the past 24hrs or so (e.g. access to frontier lead to similar symptoms in the past)?

[slava77]

@silviodonato
is there an issue already to re-enable this?
I worry a bit that #32340 may get lost for this context

[slava77]

+1

for #32352 40ed42d

• as described and hopefully really temporary. ctppsProtons can be remade from miniAOD; so, this is a rather minor loss
• jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show (relevant) differences only in the Run3 workflows showing that the ctppsProtons are not filled anymore

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[slava77]

@silviodonato
is there an issue already to re-enable this?
I worry a bit that #32340 may get lost for this context

I created #32356

[smuzaffar]

@slava77 , there has been few issues with cmseos ( https://cern.service-now.com/service-portal/?id=service_status_board ) which might be causing the failures here and massive failures in IBs

[silviodonato]

+1