Phase2-gex48 Add 2 new scenarios D75 and D76 using I13 for D71 and D74. Also remove some overlaps

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Add 2 new scenarios D75 and D76 using I13 for D71 and D74. Also remove some overlaps

PR validation:

Tested using overlap testing tools and runTheMatrix test workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32738/20886

• This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/MTDCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @slomeo, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32738/20888

• This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Track classifier using TensorFlow - continuation #32128, Squash all Patatrack developments on top of CMSSW_11_3_0_pre5 #27983, Patatrack integration - Pixel workflows (12/N) #31854, Introduce TritonService and workflows #32576

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #32738 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @cvuosalo, @wajidalikhan, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @franzoni, @silviodonato, @kpedro88, @srimanob, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74297d/12527/summary.html
COMMIT: 6a28d01
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-01-25-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32738/12527/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 10978 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2716961
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 125241
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 550
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2591148
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 156 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

[kpedro88]

@bsunanda was the overlap removal here expected to impact the older Phase 2 scenarios?

[bsunanda]

@kpedro88 The overlaps were quite serious. Yes it will. Should I stop removing overlaps and make a new path only for the new scenarios?

[kpedro88]

@bsunanda ultimately, what matters is the impact of these overlaps on physical results. If we still expect comparisons of new algorithms in 11_3_X to be valid for backporting those algorithms to 11_1_X (where we do not plan further updates to the D49 geometry), it is probably best to continue to fix D49 and other scenarios in the master branch.

[bsunanda]

@kpedro88 OK - in that case I leave them as they are now with overlap fixed for the 2026 scenarios in the master branch

[srimanob]

A question on overlap not sure I understand. If there is a large overlap between MUON and CALO, why did we miss them since D71 and D74 were added?

• D71 = T21+C14+M7+I11+O7+F6
• D74 = T21+C14+M9+I11+O7+F6

Do I miss a point here? Thanks very much @bsunanda @kpedro88

[bsunanda]

Overlaps are cured by changing muonBase.xml used in O4, O5, O6, O7. So it will affect all 2026 scenarios including D71 and D74. The 2 new scenarios: D75, D76 use I13 instead of I11.

[fabiocos]

@bsunanda thanks for updating that, there was a cleaning of v5 (I13) but not of this earlier version

[kpedro88]

@bsunanda can you update the PR title?

[cvuosalo]

+1

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[chayanit]

+1

[silviodonato]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.