Add missing GluGluTo2Jets_M_300_2000_14TeV_Exhume_cff.py

[silviodonato]

PR description:

There was some confusion between #32765 and #32868.
In the end #32868 was merged, it uses GluGluTo2Jets_M_300_2000_14TeV_Exhume_cff.py (from #32765) but it was not added.
This PR adds the missing file.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32969/21207

• This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Generator/python/GluGluTo2Jets_M_300_2000_14TeV_Exhume_cff.py modified in PR(s): Adding GEN fragment (GluGluTo2Jets_ExHume) specific for PPS wf testing #32765

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @silviodonato (Silvio Donato) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator

@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[silviodonato]

merge
bugfix, adding a file

[silviodonato]

I just wanted to be included in the 11AM IB in order to prevent to have a failing workflow
@cms-sw/generators-l2 this fragment was already discussed in #32765

[silviodonato]

please test workflows 11725.0,11925.0,11925.98,11925.99,12125.0,12325.0,12325.98,12325.99

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8c7899/13039/summary.html
COMMIT: 8ed6801
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-22-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32969/13039/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

[agrohsje]

Hi @silviodonato , now you confused me. I am closely following #32765 but the fragment that is now merged here is different from 32765. It corresponds to the original one where I commented on outdated settings (this is now fixed in 32765). I didn't sign the other one yet, as still tests are failing but I am ok with the final settings. BUT this is different from the file here. Do I miss something?

[silviodonato]

@agrohsje thanks for the check. You are right, at least d28934f is missing. I squashed the commits into one commit and solved the conflict, likely I've made some mistake, I'm sorry about that.
@mundim (or @agrohsje) could you open a PR with the fix?

[silviodonato]

@agrohsje
I've tried again to squash and solve the conflict of #32765.
Does https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/compare/master...silviodonato:PPSRelValGenFragment_reb?expand=1
include the fix you are talking about?

[mundim]

@agrohsje thanks for the check. You are right, at least d28934f is missing. I squashed the commits into one commit and solved the conflict, likely I've made some mistake, I'm sorry about that.
@mundim (or @agrohsje) could you open a PR with the fix?

Hi @silviodonato. Thanks for your help but I got a bit confused. The other message was an attempt by yourself to solve it or should I issue a new PR anyway?
Thank you very much.

[silviodonato]

Sorry for the confusion. You can use directly https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/compare/master...silviodonato:PPSRelValGenFragment_reb?expand=1
that should solve the problem, or I can open the PR