Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logic in OnlineBeamSpotESProducer [12_0_X] #35334

Merged

Conversation

francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Backport of #35333: adds a real logic in OnlineBeamSpotESProducer in order to discriminate between the two BeamSpot workflows. This is needed for the Pilot Beam Test at the end of October.

PR validation:

Tested locally using RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/test/test_scalars.py.

Backport:

Backport of #35333

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 19, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for CMSSW_12_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer (reconstruction, alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @tocheng, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

backport of #35333

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8f4c15/18738/summary.html
COMMIT: 13aecbd
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-09-19-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35334/18738/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 9 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2998564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2998530
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 19, 2021

+alca

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 19, 2021

@francescobrivio should we add an urgent label? Since it should be included in the next 12_0_X release?

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35334 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 22, 2021

see a possible solution at #35373

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

hold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request has been put on hold by @francescobrivio
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 23, 2021

@francescobrivio @tvami #35373 needs more work. In particular an update of the Run3 MC Global Tags might be in order. I propose to unhold and merge this that is already signed.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

unhold

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label Sep 23, 2021
@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

francescobrivio commented Sep 23, 2021

+alca

@qliphy @perrotta this is fully signed and can be merged at you convenience!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 24, 2021

hello, is there anything preventing the merge of this?
It is needed in order to prepare also the backport of #35373 (which is a mandatory patch for the test beam)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9b1b896 into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_0_X Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants