Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modify Run3 PSets for SoftLeptonByMVAComputers instead of individual producers #40485

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

modify Run3 PSets for SoftLeptonByMVAComputers instead of individual producers #40485

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

AnnikaStein
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

As a follow up for #40464 this PR modifies PSets instead of Producers in RecoBTag/SoftLepton/python/SoftLeptonByMVAComputers_cff.py because all six following producers use the same PSet and can therefore be treated in one go, as discussed in #40464 (comment) @tvami @francescobrivio

PR validation:

Ran basic checks and the particular workflows that were checked in #40464 as well:

scram build code-checks
scram build code-format
scram b -k -j 6 compile COMPILER=iwyu >& a.log
runTheMatrix.py -l 312.0,13234.0 -j9 --ibeos
    -> 2 2 2 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 failed

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40485/33665

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @AnnikaStein (Annika Stein) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoBTag/SoftLepton (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AlexDeMoor, @emilbols, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @AnnikaStein, @missirol, @andrzejnovak, @demuller this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 11, 2023

enable nano

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 11, 2023

assign xpog

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: xpog

@swertz,@vlimant you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 11, 2023

@cmsbuild , please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 11, 2023

type btv

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the btv label Jan 11, 2023
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/29924/summary.html
COMMIT: 70f8ef3
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40485/29924/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/29924/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/29924/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.01 step 3
140.03 step 3
140.104 step 3
140.105 step 3
140.106 step 3
140.107 step 3
140.109 step 3
140.111 step 3
140.112 step 3
140.113 step 3
140.114 step 3
140.115 step 3
140.116 step 3
140.11 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2745 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555510
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 10839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 10839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 10 files compared)
  • Checked 23 log files, 10 edm output root files, 11 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.240 2.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.57 9.53 +0.4% 1.491 1.515
2500.311 2.330 2.330 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.23 9.18 +0.5% 1.859 1.882
2500.312 2.284 2.284 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.36 9.26 +1.0% 1.847 1.885
2500.33 1.101 1.101 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 21.95 21.88 +0.3% 1.659 1.754
2500.331 1.396 1.396 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 16.07 16.16 -0.6% 1.820 1.789
2500.332 1.328 1.328 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 18.03 17.91 +0.7% 1.863 1.766
2500.401 2.161 2.161 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.36 10.34 +0.1% 1.185 1.198
2500.501 1.726 1.726 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 16.64 16.45 +1.1% 1.104 1.115
2500.511 1.134 1.134 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 30.77 30.59 +0.6% 1.351 1.367
2500.601 2.073 2.073 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 12.30 12.54 -1.9% 1.162 1.190

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Jan 12, 2023

+1

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 12, 2023

@cmsbuild , please test workflow 11634.1

@AnnikaStein
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test workflow 11634.15

Are the tests stuck? This is only 1 wf so it should not take 4 hours (yesterday evening took less than 2h)...

In any case I tested e5d3f2a locally and I get errors due to missing run3_common import (as I suggested in the review).

Sorry for the delay, joined several meetings today and will follow up asap. With the correct imports, it's almost working but still need to modify the custom nano jme which uses a slightly different strategy than the other cffs.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40485/33728

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #40485 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @swertz, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 13, 2023

@cmsbuild , please test workflow 11634.15

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/29988/summary.html
COMMIT: 1ca2ab6
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40485/29988/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

----- Begin Fatal Exception 13-Jan-2023 21:40:35 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Processing  Event run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1 stream: 0
   [1] Running path 'dqmoffline_3_step'
   [2] Prefetching for module NanoAODDQM/'nanoDQMMC'
   [3] Prefetching for module CandMCMatchTableProducer/'boostedTauMCTable'
   [4] Prefetching for module PATObjectCrossLinker/'linkedObjects'
   [5] Prefetching for module PATJetRefSelector/'finalJetsPuppi'
   [6] Prefetching for module PATJetUserDataEmbedder/'updatedJetsPuppiWithUserData'
   [7] Prefetching for module PATJetUpdater/'updatedJetsPuppi'
   [8] Prefetching for module PATJetSelector/'selectedUpdatedPatJetsAK4PFPUPPIFinal'
   [9] Prefetching for module PATJetUpdater/'updatedPatJetsTransientCorrectedAK4PFPUPPIFinal'
   [10] Prefetching for module JetTagProducer/'pfCombinedInclusiveSecondaryVertexV2BJetTagsAK4PFPUPPIFinal'
   [11] Calling method for EventSetup module CandidateCombinedSecondaryVertexESProducer/'candidateCombinedSecondaryVertexV2Computer'
   [12] While getting dependent Record from Record JetTagComputerRecord
Exception Message:
No "BTauGenericMVAJetTagComputerRcd" record found in the EventSetup.

 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer that delivers such a record.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 10839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 10813
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 10 files compared)
  • Checked 23 log files, 10 edm output root files, 11 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.240 2.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.42 9.50 -0.9% 1.448 1.475
2500.311 2.330 2.330 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.19 9.16 +0.3% 1.815 1.841
2500.312 2.284 2.284 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.32 9.29 +0.2% 1.804 1.833
2500.33 1.101 1.101 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 21.80 22.03 -1.1% 1.637 1.642
2500.331 1.396 1.396 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 16.15 16.06 +0.6% 1.790 1.790
2500.332 1.328 1.328 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 17.99 18.09 -0.6% 1.848 1.848
2500.401 2.145 2.161 -0.016 ( -0.7% ) 10.35 10.38 -0.4% 1.140 1.162
2500.501 1.716 1.726 -0.011 ( -0.6% ) 16.55 16.51 +0.2% 1.069 1.090
2500.511 1.125 1.134 -0.008 ( -0.7% ) 30.22 30.26 -0.1% 1.311 1.360
2500.601 2.056 2.073 -0.017 ( -0.8% ) 12.12 12.66 -4.3% 1.116 1.145

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

urgent
(the fix did not succeed yet, but it must be finalized in order to clean up the IBs and build the pre-release; alternatively #40464 will have to get reverted)

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

(the fix did not succeed yet, but it must be finalized in order to clean up the IBs and build the pre-release; alternatively #40464 will have to get reverted)

I think that what would have to be reverted is #40445, and that would not be good.

Given the urgency, the minimal fix for wf 11634.15 is in #40531. (This PR could be kept for future/further improvements.)

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jan 16, 2023

@cmsbuild , please test with #40531

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ee7fb/30011/summary.html
COMMIT: 1ca2ab6
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-16-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40485/30011/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
11634.15 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 161 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 67
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555449
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 10839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 10813
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 10 files compared)
  • Checked 23 log files, 10 edm output root files, 11 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.240 2.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.51 9.55 -0.4% 1.466 1.464
2500.311 2.330 2.330 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.21 9.14 +0.8% 1.837 1.829
2500.312 2.284 2.284 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.20 9.25 -0.5% 1.827 1.821
2500.33 1.101 1.101 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 22.00 21.91 +0.4% 1.642 1.649
2500.331 1.396 1.396 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 16.11 15.95 +1.0% 1.792 1.794
2500.332 1.328 1.328 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 18.43 17.88 +3.1% 1.848 1.850
2500.401 2.145 2.161 -0.016 ( -0.7% ) 10.56 10.35 +2.0% 1.158 1.153
2500.501 1.716 1.726 -0.011 ( -0.6% ) 16.73 16.40 +2.1% 1.079 1.072
2500.511 1.125 1.134 -0.008 ( -0.7% ) 30.78 30.17 +2.0% 1.334 1.317
2500.601 2.056 2.073 -0.017 ( -0.8% ) 12.60 12.48 +1.0% 1.149 1.128

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in ORP today, this can be closed since it is superseded by #40539

@rappoccio rappoccio closed this Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants