Remove all nanoV10 workflows

[swertz]

PR description:

Remove the left-over nanoAOD v10-frozen workflows forgotten in #40321, fix issue reported in #40321 (comment)

[swertz]

code-checks

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40475/33651

• This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Enable Phase2 HLT with Digi and L1T step #40412, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @swertz (Sébastien Wertz) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[swertz]

please test

[smuzaffar]

test parameters:

• workflow = 140.01,140.03

[smuzaffar]

please test
lets run the tests for failing workflows too

[perrotta]

type bugfix

[perrotta]

urgent

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-70b29d/29910/summary.html
COMMIT: 298ad8e
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40475/29910/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.01 step 3
140.03 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 20410 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555513
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 217 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

+1

• Previously failing run3 nanoAOD workflows can finish without errors with this fix
• @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 let me bypass your signature to have the IB clean in master, but please feel free to comment or propose different solutlons even after this PR gets merged

[perrotta]

merge

[srimanob]

Hi @perrotta

As a question in #40321 (comment), should we consider to add 2022 data workflow to runTheMatrix? So it can be tested at every PR test, and spot any issues before we reprocess it.
We currently have only 2021 wf, which I think they will be less use, for physics analysis, compared with 2022.

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/scripts/runTheMatrix.py#L77-L79

[perrotta]

Hi @perrotta

As a question in #40321 (comment), should we consider to add 2022 data workflow to runTheMatrix? So it can be tested at every PR test, and spot any issues before we reprocess it. We currently have only 2021 wf, which I think they will be less use, for physics analysis, compared with 2022.

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/scripts/runTheMatrix.py#L77-L79

I fully agree.
We can either add the 2022 workflows, or just replace the 2021 ones with them, which is probably better if we want to keep the short matrix short