Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for nanoGEN jets #41163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023
Merged

Fix for nanoGEN jets #41163

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

Cvico
Copy link
Contributor

@Cvico Cvico commented Mar 23, 2023

PR description

This PR includes a minimal change in the configuration file that is used for producing NanoGEN format: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanogen_cff.py.

Additional information

This issue has been known for some time, but it was never fixed and included in the master branch up until know. Everything regarding this issue is discussed in 1 and 2.

I'm adding @kdlong in the thread (since he is the one that told me the issue) just in case there's any other detail I might be leaving out. The changes to the central code should have 0 impact (just change the object that is used for computing generation jets), but the physics impact should be quite relevant specially for those analyses that use NanoGEN information for comparing generation jets between nanoGEN and nanoAOD.

References

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41163/34822

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Cvico (Carlos Vico Villalba) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @AnnikaStein this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Mar 24, 2023

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18d7ca/31577/summary.html
COMMIT: 61caf63
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-03-23-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41163/31577/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 14 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 15 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3554286
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3554255
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@kdlong
Copy link
Contributor

kdlong commented Mar 24, 2023

Thanks @Cvico, it's nice to see this bug finally corrected.

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Mar 24, 2023

+1

Thanks! Perhaps it could be good to also backport this to 13_0_X, in case people will use the same release for NanoGEN and NanoAOD v12...

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1cc25cf into cms-sw:master Mar 24, 2023
@Cvico
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cvico commented Mar 24, 2023

Hi. Thanks for merging my PR!. Regarding the comment from @swertz,
if you think this would be good to backport, I can prepare it.

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Mar 27, 2023

if you think this would be good to backport, I can prepare it.

Yes, I think it would be good to fix in 13_0 as well. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants