updates for electrons stream

[rgerosa]

Update of electron stream code :

1. work with electrons selected from more than one HLT path
2. dump more than one electron for each event in order to commission it also with Zee events

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @rgerosa (raffaele gerosa) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

updates for electrons stream

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/EcalAlCaRecoProducers

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @cerminar, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[diguida]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c30d061
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9112/4710/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
658917b
4342d07
7362447
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9112/4710/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9112/4710/git-merge-result

[perrotta]

Please provide also a backport to 74X if you even want it used in the HLT for 2015 data taking

[mmusich]

@perrotta, this was adressed first in 7.4.X through #9111. We asked to move to 7.5.X and after this is merged re-open the backport

[perrotta]

Ah, ok, thank you @mmusich
It wouldn't be bad if companion pull requests are always linked as reference in the comment fields, in order to ease bookkeeping and evaluation: well, now the link to the 74X counterpart of this PR is there :-)

[rgerosa]

What is the status of the this PR? we would like to have a fast back port to 74X

[diguida]

@rgerosa I am looking into it. Busy days now...

[diguida]

-1
superseded by #9256

[diguida]

@rgerosa your commit has been merged into #9256
The changes you did are fine for us, but, as reported in #5772 (comment) there are still some optimisations to be done. I will point you to the code sections where the changes should be made.