wrap at 80 col

assessments/intake-process.md

@@ -1,34 +1,45 @@
 # Security Assessment Priorities & Pipeline Intake Process
 
-SIG-Security has a volunteer team of subject matter experts and industry professionals dedicated to helping SIG-Security members, the TOC, and the larger CNCF community maintain an understanding of the current state of security in the cloud native ecosystem and helping cloud native projects succeed. 
+SIG-Security has a volunteer team of subject matter experts and industry
+professionals dedicated to helping SIG-Security members, the TOC, and the larger
+CNCF community maintain an understanding of the current state of security in the
+cloud native ecosystem and helping cloud native projects succeed.
 
-The following process describes how projects are prioritized for security assessments.
+The following process describes how projects are prioritized for security
+assessments.
 
 # Authority
 
-* The [Security Assessment Facilitator](../governance/roles.md#security-assessment-facilitator) maintains the Assessment queue
-* A named chair provides oversight for the Security Assessment initiative. 
-This chair can adjust queue, and is also responsible for conveying TOC 
-instructions, when needed. (Sarah Allen is the current named Chair for Security Assessments.)
+* The [Security Assessment
+  Facilitator](../governance/roles.md#security-assessment-facilitator) maintains
+  the Assessment queue
+* A named chair provides oversight for the Security Assessment initiative. This
+  chair can adjust queue, and is also responsible for conveying TOC
+  instructions, when needed. (Sarah Allen is the current named Chair for
+  Security Assessments.)
 
 # Pre-conditions
 
-* The project is either a CNCF project OR an assertion that the project is cloud native (any objection must be resolved before an assessment would be considered)
+* The project is either a CNCF project OR an assertion that the project is cloud
+  native (any objection must be resolved before an assessment would be
+  considered)
 * The project has identified a project lead and has a written self-assessment
 
 # Intake priorities
 
-1. TOC requests SIG-Security review a specific project or adjust priorities
-   a. TOC request will not interrupt an ongoing assessment
-   b. TOC requests may jump the prioritized queue of projects waiting for an assessment
-2. Projects that have received a CNCF Security Audit will be reviewed within a year of audit.
-3. CNCF Projects that request a review (or invited by SIG members). Prioritized by 
-project majority (Graduated projects will be highest priority, then incubated projects, then sandbox.)
+1. TOC requests SIG-Security review a specific project or adjust priorities a.
+   TOC request will not interrupt an ongoing assessment b. TOC requests may jump
+   the prioritized queue of projects waiting for an assessment
+2. Projects that have received a CNCF Security Audit will be reviewed within a
+   year of audit.
+3. CNCF Projects that request a review (or invited by SIG members). Prioritized
+   by project majority (Graduated projects will be highest priority, then
+   incubated projects, then sandbox.)
 4. Non-CNCF Projects that request a review (or invited by SIG members)
 
 ## Updates and renewal
 
-The Security Assessment team will review assessed projects annually, 
-focusing primarily on any issues or concerns raised in previous assessments, 
-addressing new functionality that affects risk profile of the project, 
-and any issue that may have been flagged about the project.
+The Security Assessment team will review assessed projects annually, focusing
+primarily on any issues or concerns raised in previous assessments, addressing
+new functionality that affects risk profile of the project, and any issue that
+may have been flagged about the project.