Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CNSWP v2] Apply feedback from Retrospective + Micro-survey #832

Closed
3 tasks done
PushkarJ opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

[CNSWP v2] Apply feedback from Retrospective + Micro-survey #832

PushkarJ opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers

Comments

@PushkarJ
Copy link
Contributor

PushkarJ commented Dec 5, 2021

Description: We did a retrospective on the whitepaper and found some really great ideas on how to improve. The v2 whitepaper should reflect these improvements

Impact: Gives a clear signal to readers that we listen to their feedback and improve our deliverables by letting them shape what we deliver

Scope: Following tasks are involved:

  • Add a link to a permanent survey or page (could be a github issue) where readers can leave their feedback
  • Add a section talking about retrospective, survey, micro-survey and its results
  • Add relevant content like Guideline for Applying Secure Defaults #734 as a link or built-in section in the paper

Additional info:
#734 #480 #753 are related to this content. Overall in scope of #747

@PushkarJ PushkarJ added suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category triage-required Requires triage labels Dec 5, 2021
@devadvocado
Copy link

@PushkarJ happy to take ownership for this issue

@TheFoxAtWork TheFoxAtWork added whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers and removed triage-required Requires triage labels Jan 19, 2022
@PushkarJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @devadvocado

I need to do some work on #734. But you can start working on other items. I tagged you in the google doc for a placeholder location where we can add details.

@devadvocado
Copy link

Thanks @PushkarJ, I'll take a look on it this by EOW and start working on it.

@PushkarJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing as relevant updates are in place

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants