New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Reference Section #92
Conversation
I don't think the bpmn workflows are need. I consider the images of the generated processes should suffice. |
@ruromero I think that there is value in having files to compare both, graphical and technical description of the models. I am happy to remove, but the files also give you pointers to the schemas which makes the definitions easy to validate. |
I think having the bpmn xml in separate files can be useful to readers. @salaboy the only thing I'd suggest is to remove from the xml: so we stay vendor neutral ;) |
@tsurdilo apologies.. done! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM |
This PR adds the reference section with a mention to the BPMN standard by the OMG group as well as encourage people to share other related tools that can help to make decisions while creating this specification.
I've included some examples covering the use cases listed in this spec translated into BPMN for further comparison.