Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sql: reduce (eliminate?) support for sessions without a current database set #23145

Closed
knz opened this issue Feb 27, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #24735
Closed

sql: reduce (eliminate?) support for sessions without a current database set #23145

knz opened this issue Feb 27, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #24735
Labels
A-sql-pgcompat Semantic compatibility with PostgreSQL C-enhancement Solution expected to add code/behavior + preserve backward-compat (pg compat issues are exception) S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption.

Comments

@knz
Copy link
Contributor

knz commented Feb 27, 2018

Discussed with @nvanbenschoten and @jordanlewis while working on #21456 and #23045.

pg does not support client sessions without a current database set. The virtual schemas (especially pg_catalog) are not well-defined if there is no current database.

Also in their current implementation they can generate a large amount data if queried by a client without a current database set, putting pressure on the SQL allocation pool.

The discussion on #21456 suggests evolving CockroachDB so that client sessions more often find themselves with a current database set by default. There's a spectrum of approaches:

  • have the current database set to system if not specified in the conn string / pgwire options
  • have the current database set to some arbitrary constant (e.g. default) and encourage the user via cockroach sql to create the database if it doesn't exist yet
    • might be a UX issue since only admin users can create databases
  • have the current database set to the username (like in pg), encourage the user to create
    • same UX problem as above
  • make every new cluster contain a "default" database, set that as default current database for new sessions that don't specify otherwise
  • same as above, but create the "default" db on-demand automatically

cc @bdarnell

@knz knz added C-enhancement Solution expected to add code/behavior + preserve backward-compat (pg compat issues are exception) S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption. labels Feb 27, 2018
@bdarnell
Copy link
Member

Personally coming from a mysql background (where having no current database is perfectly normal), I find the postgres behavior annoying.

In postgres, creating a database is a non-sql command, so there's no question of how do you connect to the database to create your first database. We have CREATE DATABASE as a SQL statement, so you need to be able to connect somehow (either to some default (possibly system) or to a database name that doesn't yet exist). Both of these seem weird to me; I think I'd rather keep the no-database state (even if it means disallowing unqualified access to the virtual schemas).

@knz
Copy link
Contributor Author

knz commented Feb 27, 2018

Of the various options listed above, none include the situation "refuse the user a connection because the db in the conn string doesn't exist yet".

I'd personally like that the user always finds a database already available for them if they don't really know what they're doing (yet), this will lower the onramp.

@bdarnell
Copy link
Member

Of the various options listed above, none include the situation "refuse the user a connection because the db in the conn string doesn't exist yet".

Understood, but the fact that we allow this is something that makes CRDB unusual. Other DBs only allow you to connect to databases that already exist. I happen to like this, but "connect to a non-existent database and create it as your first action" feels like a non-intuitive clever trick rather than something we have to ask everyone to do when they're first starting out.

@knz
Copy link
Contributor Author

knz commented Feb 27, 2018

Ok, so don't you also support the idea to make a default db exist automatically?

@bdarnell
Copy link
Member

Of the proposals here, I think that a default database created at cluster initialization time is the best option, but even that has strange edge cases. What if you drop or change permissions on the default database?

@knz
Copy link
Contributor Author

knz commented Feb 27, 2018

I'd say that no users should have DROP permission on it. If root wants to disallow CREATE after other databases have been set up, that would be kosher with me.

@knz knz added this to Backlog in (DEPRECATED) SQL Front-end, Lang & Semantics via automation Apr 27, 2018
@knz knz added the A-sql-pgcompat Semantic compatibility with PostgreSQL label Apr 30, 2018
@knz knz moved this from Triage to Current milestone in (DEPRECATED) SQL Front-end, Lang & Semantics Apr 30, 2018
craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2018
24735: sql: sanitize the "no current db" story r=knz a=knz

Fixes #23893.
Fixes #23145.
Updates #24598.
Informs #24056.
Informs #23958.

Prior to this patch, CockroachdB made it excessively simple for client
connections to not have any current database set. Also by design
CockroachDB allows a connection to be opened with a non-existent
database set as current.

This in turn causes various problems related to name resolution and
the `pg_catalog` schema.

To understand these problems we can consider separately two groups of
users, which have separate use cases:

- newcomers to CockroachDB that don't have prior experience with SQL
  or PostgreSQL. These will not know about "databases" in any sense,
  and will use CockroachDB with default options. This includes using
  `cockroach sql` with no current database selected. These users have
  to be taught upfront that they need to "create a database" and "set
  the current database", which they may or may not (more likely not)
  be interested in.

  When these users then transition into writing apps, they will
  copy-paste the conn URL printed by `cockroach start` (which sets no
  current db) into some ORM or framework, and then will regretfully
  observe that their app fail in mysterious ways because the current
  db is not set (also see the next point).

- users of existing applications or SQL drivers that have been
  developed to target PostgreSQL. These apps commonly contain code
  that:

  - connect to a database named "`postgres`" by default, and make this
    default hard(er) to customize. For example Ecto (Elixir ORM)
    doesn't make this configurable.

    (From the PostgreSQL docs: "After initialization, a database
    cluster will contain a database named `postgres`, which is meant as
    a default database for use by utilities, users and third party
    applications. The database server itself does not require the
    postgres database to exist, but many external utility programs
    assume it exists.")

  - (regardless of which db is selected as current), will issue some
    introspection queries using `pg_catalog` before any additional
    initialization is made by the higher-level app code, in particular
    before the app can issue `CREATE DATABASE`. Currently `pg_catalog`
    queries (and several other things) fail if the current database is
    unset or set to a non-existing database.

To address this relatively large class of problems, this patch
modifies CockroachDB as follows:

- all clusters (existing or new) now get two empty databases on
  startup (created by a migration) called `defaultdb` and `postgres`.

- when a client doesn't specify a current db in their conn string
  (i.e. in the pgwire options), the `defaultdb` database is picked up
  instead.

This resolves all the known problems around the situations identified
above.

The two new databases behave like any regular database and are
provided for convenience to newcomers and
compatibility. (Administrators are free to drop them afterwards to
restore the previous situation, if that is actively desired.)

In addition, to make it slightly harder for newcomers to shoot
themselves in the foot, the `database` session variable cannot be set
to the empty string any more if `sql_safe_updates` is otherwise set.

Three alternatives to this approach were considered, discussed with
@jordanlewis and @nvanbenschoten in their quality of pg compatibility
experts, and with @bdarnell in his quality of carer for newcomers, and
ultimately rejected:

A) generate the current db upon connection if it does not exist, make
   connections using the empty string as curdb use `system` instead.

   Rejected because we don't like to auto-create upon connection. Too
   easy to flood the system with bogus database names by typos in the
   connection string.

B) Pre-populate clusters with a special anonymous database (db name =
   empty string).

   Rejected because there are too many areas in CockroachDB with a
   risk to fail silently or with weird error messages as a
   result. Also does not solve the problem of clients that want a db
   called `postgres`.

C) Auto-create a database named after the user upon user creation
   (with an optional flag to skip db creation).

   Rejected because it does not solve the problem of clients that want
   a db called `postgres`. @bdarnell: creating a database per user also
   implicitly encourages bad habits (like sharing certs for the user
   whose name corresponds to the database instead of creating multiple
   users).

D) Implement some magic in the handling of `pg_catalog`, name
   resolution and all other pieces that currently don't like non-existent
   `database` values to create the appearance of something that works.

   Rejected because too complex to implement successfully (there are
   many moving parts that need to be touched to make this work) and
   the resulting magic would be hard to understand by CockroachDB
   contributors and hard to maintain over time.

E) Auto-create only one database called `defaultdb`.

   Rejected because it does not solve the problem of clients that want
   a db called `postgres`.

F) Auto-create only one database called `postgres` and use that as
   default when no current db is specified.

   Rejected because not good for branding.

G) Name the `defaultdb` either `def`, `default` or `default_database`.

   The word "`default`" was rejected because it is a SQL keyword
   and would cause queries using it to fail in obscure ways.

   The word "`def`" (similar to what MySQL uses in
   `information_schema`) was rejected because it refers too strongly
   to other uses of this word in programming languages ("define").

   "`default_database`" was rejected because too verbose.

Release note (sql change): new and existing clusters will now contain
two empty databases called `defaultdb` and `postgres` by default. The
database `defaultdb` is automatically used for clients that connect
without a current database set (e.g. without a database component in
the connection URL). The database `postgres` is provided for
compatibility with PostgreSQL client frameworks that require it to
exist when the database server has ben freshly installed. Both new
databases behave like any other regular database.

Release note (general change): existing clusters upgraded to this
version of CockroachDB will automatically see two new empty databases
named `defaultdb` and `postgres`. These were added for compatibility
with PostgreSQL and to ease adoption of CockroachDB. They can be
manually deleted by an administrator if the client applications are
determined not to require them.

Co-authored-by: Raphael 'kena' Poss <knz@cockroachlabs.com>
@craig craig bot closed this as completed in #24735 May 22, 2018
@knz knz moved this from Current milestone to Finished (milestone 0423) in (DEPRECATED) SQL Front-end, Lang & Semantics May 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-sql-pgcompat Semantic compatibility with PostgreSQL C-enhancement Solution expected to add code/behavior + preserve backward-compat (pg compat issues are exception) S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants