Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-23.1: sql/schemachanger: create partial index with inserts can fail #110584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

fqazi
Copy link
Collaborator

@fqazi fqazi commented Sep 13, 2023

Previously, the temporary index created during CREATE INDEX with partial indexes did not correctly copy over the predicate. If an insert and a CREATE INDEX (for partial indexes) were run concurrently, the CREATE INDEX could fail since the temporary index would contain extra rows. Eventually, validation would fail. This patch copies the embedded expression for partial indexes to address this.

Fixes: #110198

Release note (bug fix): CREATE INDEX for partial indexes could fail with "ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint" if concurrent inserts happened simultaneously.

Release justification: low-risk fix which can prevent CREATE PARTIAL INDEX working with concurrent DML

Previously, the temporary index created during CREATE INDEX with partial
indexes did not correctly copy over the predicate. If an insert and a
CREATE INDEX (for partial indexes) were run concurrently, the CREATE
INDEX could fail since the temporary index would contain extra rows.
Eventually, validation would fail.  This patch copies the embedded
expression for partial indexes to address this.

Fixes: cockroachdb#110198

Release note (bug fix): CREATE INDEX for partial indexes could fail with
"ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint" if concurrent
inserts happened simultaneously.
@fqazi fqazi requested a review from a team as a code owner September 13, 2023 17:05
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Sep 13, 2023
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@fqazi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fqazi commented Sep 19, 2023

@Xiang-Gu TFTR!

@fqazi fqazi merged commit 432c74b into cockroachdb:release-23.1 Sep 19, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants