Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2: server/status: silence missing CPU cgroup error #118674

Merged

Conversation

nvanbenschoten
Copy link
Member

Backport 1/1 commits from #118657.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


Fixes #111648.

This commit eliminates log spam when a CPU cgroup is not configured for the cockroach process. This is a supported deployment mode, but since v22.2.11/v23.1.3/v23.2.0 (df55958), we've been spamming the logs with "unable to get CPU capacity" errors every 10 seconds when running outside of a CPU cgroup.

I considered reducing the severity of the log message from ERROR to INFO, but even that seemed loud for a log message every 10s in a supported deployment mode. For now, we remove the log message.

Release note (bug fix): Cockroach will no longer spam the logs with "unable to get CPU capacity" errors every 10 seconds when running outside of a CPU cgroup.


Release justification: removes spammy log message.

Fixes cockroachdb#111648.

This commit eliminates log spam when a CPU cgroup is not configured for the
cockroach process. This is a supported deployment mode, but since
`v22.2.11`/`v23.1.3`/`v23.2.0` (df55958), we've been spamming the logs with
"unable to get CPU capacity" errors every 10 seconds when running outside of
a CPU cgroup.

I considered reducing the severity of the log message from ERROR to INFO, but
even that seemed loud for a log message every 10s in a supported deployment mode.
For now, we remove the log message.

Release note (bug fix): Cockroach will no longer spam the logs with "unable to
get CPU capacity" errors every 10 seconds when running outside of a CPU cgroup.
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten requested review from a team as code owners February 2, 2024 20:15
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten requested review from xinhaoz and removed request for a team February 2, 2024 20:15
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL and one additional
    TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Feb 2, 2024
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Feb 2, 2024

It looks like your PR touches production code but doesn't add or edit any test code. Did you consider adding tests to your PR?

🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten merged commit 392bda4 into cockroachdb:release-22.2 Feb 5, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten deleted the backport22.2-118657 branch February 7, 2024 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants