Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-23.1: schemachanger: address index validation errors during pk swap #118972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

fqazi
Copy link
Collaborator

@fqazi fqazi commented Feb 8, 2024

Backport 1/1 commits from #118843.


Previously, when mutations were made public for validation queries, the declarative schema changer primary key swaps were not appropriately handled. This could lead to scenarios where queries would be unable to find columns in recreated secondary indexes that should ideally exist (i.e. columns from the old primary key). This would cause validation to fail on these newly created indexes. To address, this patch adds logic for making declarative primary key swaps mutations properly by detecting them.

Fixes: #118626

Release note (bug fix): ALTER PRIMARY KEY could fail with a "non-nullable column with no value! Index scanned .." when validating recreated secondary indexes.

Release justification: Low risk changes that fixes a regression that prevents us from being able ALTER PRIMARY KEY if any index exists accessing the old PK columns via an expression

Previously, when mutations were made public for validation queries,
the declarative schema changer primary key swaps were not appropriately
handled. This could lead to scenarios where queries would be unable to
find columns in recreated secondary indexes that should ideally exist
(i.e. columns from the old primary key). This would cause validation
to fail on these newly created indexes. To address, this patch adds
logic for making declarative primary key swaps mutations properly by
detecting them.

Fixes: cockroachdb#118626

Release note (bug fix): ALTER PRIMARY KEY could fail with a
"non-nullable column <x> with no value! Index scanned .." when
validating recreated secondary indexes.
@fqazi fqazi requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2024 20:04
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL and one additional
    TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Feb 8, 2024
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@rafiss rafiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! can you post in #db-backports-point-releases ?

@rafiss rafiss requested a review from mgartner February 13, 2024 18:07
@rafiss rafiss merged commit 78de5d3 into cockroachdb:release-23.1 Feb 13, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants