release-20.2: sql: require placeholder types to be identical to use a cached plan

[blathers-crl]

Backport 1/1 commits from #67651 on behalf of @rafiss.

/cc @cockroachdb/release

Release justification: low-impact but high-reward bug fix.

---

fixes #67605

Release note (bug fix): Fix a bug where a prepared statement could
incorrectly reuse the query plan of a different prepared statements that
had similar, but not identical type hints.

---

[blathers-crl]

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

• Patches should only be created for serious issues.
• Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
• Patches should change as little code as possible.
• Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
• Patches should not add new functionality.

If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.

• There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
• The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
• New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
• The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

• What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
• Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
• If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

[cockroach-teamcity]

This change is 

[rafiss]

@RaduBerinde or @yuzefovich friendly ping on reviewing this

[yuzefovich]

Oops, missed it.

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1.
Reviewable status: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @RaduBerinde)

[rafiss]

tftr!