storage: don't sync with reads on lease extension #8352
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tschottdorf has a note in the code about why new leases need to
sometimes block reads while the lease is applied - you don't want reads
in between setting the new lease and updating the timestamp cache's
low-water mark. It seems safe to me to not do this in case of a lease
extension, since in that case we're not updating the aforementioned
low-water mark.
Besides hopefully being a perf optimization, this allows tests to do
lease extensions while a read is blocked, which I need for #8310.
This change is