Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2.0: backupccl: enable restore_span.target_size #90630

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Oct 25, 2022

Backport 1/1 commits from #89333 on behalf of @adityamaru.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


This setting was previously disabled because of timeouts being observed when restoring our TPCCInc fixtures. The cause of those timeouts has been identified as
#88329 making it safe to re-enable merging of spans during restore. This settings prevents restore from over-splitting and leaving the cluster with a merge hangover post restore.

Informs: #86470

Release note (sql change): Sets backup.restore_span.target_size to default to 384 MiB so that restore merges upto that size of spans when reading from the backup before actually ingesting data. This should reduce the number of ranges created during restore and thereby reduce the merging of ranges that needs to occur post restore.


Release justification:

This setting was previously disabled because of timeouts being
observed when restoring our TPCCInc fixtures. The cause of those
timeouts has been identified as
#88329 making it safe
to re-enable merging of spans during restore. This settings prevents
restore from over-splitting and leaving the cluster with a merge hangover
post restore.

Informs: #86470

Release note (sql change): Sets `backup.restore_span.target_size`
to default to 384 MiB so that restore merges upto that size of spans
when reading from the backup before actually ingesting data. This should
reduce the number of ranges created during restore and thereby reduce
the merging of ranges that needs to occur post restore.
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2022 16:19
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.2.0-89333 branch from 3309580 to 85e71f3 Compare October 25, 2022 16:19
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from rhu713 and removed request for a team October 25, 2022 16:19
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Oct 25, 2022

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from dt and stevendanna October 25, 2022 16:19
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Oct 25, 2022
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@dt
Copy link
Member

dt commented Oct 25, 2022

this is just #90573 which blathers decided to close for some reason

@github-actions
Copy link

Reminder: it has been 3 weeks please merge or close your backport!

@stevendanna
Copy link
Collaborator

Eek! Looks like we missed this. If we can still make the RC, it might be worth merging.

@shermanCRL
Copy link
Contributor

If nothing blocking, please merge now.

@github-actions
Copy link

Reminder: it has been 3 weeks please merge or close your backport!

@celiala
Copy link
Collaborator

celiala commented Feb 9, 2023

Closing this so I can delete the temporary "dot zero" branch.
This change was merged into the main release branch via #89351

@celiala celiala closed this Feb 9, 2023
@mgartner mgartner deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.2.0-89333 branch May 23, 2023 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. no-backport-pr-activity O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants