Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded Q -> M from 61 [1661963759888] #303

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Upgraded Q -> M from 61 [1661963759888] #303

code423n4 opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #61 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows:

@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge labels Aug 31, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2022
@HickupHH3
Copy link
Collaborator

_safemint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible
dup of #183

@JeeberC4 JeeberC4 added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants