Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #1258 [1716287922036] #1316

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #1258 [1716287922036] #1316

c4-judge opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #1258 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:

Liquidators are not incentivized to liquidate small positions #1258
@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label May 21, 2024
c4-judge added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@c4-judge
pontifex issue #1316 (File generated from upgraded finding by judge k…
773c576 
…oolexcrypto)
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

koolexcrypto marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@c4-judge