Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint to version 3 #13554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 2, 2017
Merged

Update eslint to version 3 #13554

merged 1 commit into from Mar 2, 2017

Conversation

islemaster
Copy link
Contributor

Updates our eslint dependency from ^2.8.0 to ^3.7.1. The latest version of ESLint is 3.16.1 but 3.7.1 is the version currently used by Hound and I'm hoping to enable that soon.

To my great surprise, no code or configuration changes were necessary for this upgrade. You can see the "Migrating to v3.0.0" docs here - it turns out we already did everything we need to do to stay compatible.

Updates our eslint dependency from ^2.8.0 to ^3.7.1.  The latest version of ESLint is 3.16.1 but 3.7.1 is the [version currently used by Hound](https://github.com/houndci/linters/blob/master/package.json#L11) and I'm hoping to enable that soon.

To my great surprise, no code or configuration changes were necessary for this upgrade.  You can see the ["Migrating to v3.0.0"](http://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/migrating-to-3.0.0) docs here - it turns out we already did everything we need to do to stay compatible.
Copy link
Member

@davidsbailey davidsbailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking forward to hound for js!

@islemaster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sadly, it looks like Hound for JS is not happening yet.

@islemaster islemaster merged commit e6e5bcc into staging Mar 2, 2017
@islemaster islemaster deleted the eslint-3 branch March 2, 2017 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants