Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update TYPES_WITHOUT_IDEAL_LEVEL_SOURCE. #14992

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 11, 2017

Conversation

ashercodeorg
Copy link
Contributor

After this PR is merged, I'll manually remove the ideal_level_source_id if one exists, for all levels of level types being added to TYPES_WITHOUT_IDEAL_LEVEL_SOURCE.

@ashercodeorg ashercodeorg changed the title Update types without ideal level source Update TYPES_WITHOUT_IDEAL_LEVEL_SOURCE. May 10, 2017
# 'Maze',
# 'Studio',
# 'StudioEC',
# ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

presumably commented because we dont use this for anything atm?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct. Though I think it is worth making explicit which level types do we have ideal level sources. Especially until we instrument a check, this confirms that the missing level types have been thought about.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would love to see that check added if this is important, rather than depending on people realizing this is somewhere they need to look/something they need to think about.

@ashercodeorg ashercodeorg merged commit dd2001c into staging May 11, 2017
@ashercodeorg ashercodeorg deleted the updateTypesWithoutIdealLevelSource branch May 11, 2017 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants