Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assign course from teacher-dashboard #15673

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jun 7, 2017
Merged

Conversation

Bjvanminnen
Copy link
Contributor

@Bjvanminnen Bjvanminnen commented Jun 7, 2017

When creating/updating a section, in addition to scripts, we will now show you a set of full courses you can also assign to the section (currently we will only show these if you have the assignCourses experiment enabled)

image

Did a bunch of manual testing (Poorva also did some on an adhoc I created). Also validated that the teacher-dashboard.feature UI test passes.

};
}
}
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The approach I've taken involves setting assign_id and is_course on the client, and making sure they are updated as appropriate.

I suspect this isn't the most correct way of doing things in angular, where they have this idea of a model that is kept in sync between client/server. That said, the approach I've taken is one that I can understand/reason about, and will presumably also be somewhat short lived as we plan to move this table to React in the very near future.

$scope.sections.$promise.then(sections => {
$scope.sections.forEach(section => {
section.assign_id = $scope.getAssignmentId(section);
});
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

assign_id is the approach i've taken for dealing with the fact that scripts/courses each have their own id space.

Copy link
Contributor

@ashercodeorg ashercodeorg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for ruby.

@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ module ScriptConstants
# This can be used to override that, with lower numbers ordered sooner, and higher numbers
# ordered later.
CATEGORY_ORDERING_PRIORITY = {
# We want full courses to show up first in our list
full_course: -1,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these values important (the relative positioning all that matters?)? Are these values ever persisted anywhere?

If no (yes) and no, I'd vote against moving into the negative numbers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not persisted anywhere afaik, but we do use 0 as default in places (which feels more intuitive than bumping everything by one and having default be 1)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, then a negative number would be appropriate. Carry on.

@@ -581,6 +581,9 @@ def self.update_if_owner(params)
# explicitly clear script_id (unless we're also passed in a valid script id
# as a param
fields[:script_id] = nil
else
# If no course_id provided, make sure we clear an existing course_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be "If no valid course_id provided..."? Alternately, I'd expect the else to be an elsif.

}
section_id = DashboardSection.create(params)
row = Dashboard.db[:sections].where(id: section_id).first
assert_equal course_id, row[:course_id]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was already asserted in "assigns a course to a section without one" and not part of this test. Aside: perhaps adding the assert_nil row[:script_id] to this test is appropriate?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re: your aside - I have exactly that on line 523, or am I misunderstanding your comment?

This test is meant to be about the update_if_owner call. The asserts here are to ensure that our initial setup is in the right state before we make that call.

$scope.sectionToSave = $scope.sections.indexOf(section);
$('#assign-confirm').modal('show');
return;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You still want to return here before the $scope.send_save() call, that way the assignment isn't saved until the hoc script assignment warning is dismissed, and so that the script assignment doesn't get saved if they hit cancel.

if (assignIdChanged) {
const assignable = $scope.assignable_list.find(a => a.assign_id === section.assign_id);
// update course/script assigned to section. Right now a section can only
// have one or the other, but that will change in th efuture.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in th efuture.

nit: typo

@@ -876,7 +893,11 @@ function main() {
// fill in the course dropdown with the section's default course
$scope.section.$promise.then(
function (section) {
$scope.script_id = section.script.id;
// TODO:(bjvanminnen) - also handle case where we have a course, but not
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

purposefully leaving a TODO here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this is future work.

@Bjvanminnen Bjvanminnen merged commit 73d8a39 into staging Jun 7, 2017
@Bjvanminnen Bjvanminnen deleted the assignCourseFromTD branch June 7, 2017 23:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants