Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

start auto-marking successful DTTs green #19787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2018
Merged

Conversation

davidsbailey
Copy link
Member

@davidsbailey davidsbailey commented Jan 5, 2018

#19609 and #19679 set up automatically marking successful DTTs green, but the marking mechanism was temporarily disabled while we worked out the kinks in the detection logic. Since the latter of those PRs was merged at 4:38pm on Jan 2, the detection logic has correctly marked 3 DTTs green:

and has correctly NOT marked the remaining failing DTTs green.

Interestingly, in the above instances the commit hash is 1 character shorter when being auto-marked green than it is when being marked green via bin/dotd script, e.g. b50bf9e instead of b50bf9ee. This shorter hash is coming from the git rev-parse --short command being run locally, which is guaranteed to provide a unique commit hash prefix, instead of the utility function GitHub.sha, which is used to get a fixed-length, 8-character hash prefix from github.

Copy link
Contributor

@islemaster islemaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 Hooray!

@asherkach
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 Hooray! (and I'm not even effected...)

@davidsbailey davidsbailey merged commit 75d183f into staging Jan 5, 2018
@davidsbailey davidsbailey deleted the auto-mark-dtts-green branch January 5, 2018 06:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants