New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
InstructionsWithWorkspace owns the resizer #32417
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
islemaster
force-pushed
the
instructions-resizer-moved
branch
from
December 14, 2019 01:12
2da715b
to
8ac2617
Compare
islemaster
force-pushed
the
instructions-resizer-moved
branch
from
December 19, 2019 02:02
c4679b6
to
a2e022e
Compare
dmcavoy
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I like that this pulls HeightResizer out if TopInstructions.
I'm wondering if the next step after this is looking into the redux store which is managing instructions height and trying to simplify some of the complexity there.
This was referenced Jan 6, 2020
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LP-838: As a first step towards simplifying our instructions resize code, moves ownership of the
HeightResizer
component up out ofTopInstructions
into theInstructionsWithWorkspace
component.I believe this makes more sense -
TopInstructions
andCodeWorkspace
are both rendered byInstructionsWithWorkspace
, both respecting the instructions size currently stored in redux. At the moment,TopInstructions
also owns the resizer control that sits between these two resizable areas, but it's unclear whyTopInstructions
should be concerned with this resize bar, rather than simply rendering in the space it's given. (There are circumstances where content changes inside the instructions will trigger a container resize, but that seems like a side-effect, not a primary concern).In the new setup,
TopInstructions
,HeightResizer
andCodeWorkspace
are siblings, and their parentInstructionsWithWorkspace
owns the resize logic that governs these three components.This is nearly a pure refactor - from a behavior point of view everything should be exactly the same. The structure of the DOM changes a bit, with the resizer moving out a few layers.
Testing story
My approach to this change:
InstructionsWithWorkspace
.HeightResizer
, keeping tests passing.Also manual testing on CSF and non-CSF levels to sanity check that the resizer still looks and feels the same.
Reviewer Checklist: